LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

The effects of gap size in a group selection silvicultural system on the growth response of young, planted Douglas-fir: a sector plot analysis

Photo from wikipedia

The growth response of planted 7and 11-year-old Douglas-fir was measured in a series of 11 group selection harvest gaps ranging in size from 0.05 to 1.1 ha repeated on two… Click to show full abstract

The growth response of planted 7and 11-year-old Douglas-fir was measured in a series of 11 group selection harvest gaps ranging in size from 0.05 to 1.1 ha repeated on two study sites. The sites are part of the Silviculture Treatments for Ecosystem Management in the Sayward experiment on central-eastern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. In each gap, trees were measured in four 9° sector plots oriented in orthogonal cardinal directions from a central vertex. A non-linear two-parameter model was used to examine relationships between per tree and unit area measures and gap size. Despite high levels of growth variability, there was a general, consistent asymptotic growth response to increasing gap size. The minimum gap size required for adequate Douglas-fir sapling height growth was between 0.24 and 0.33 ha and the gap diameter divided by surrounding residual tree dominant height (Dgap/Hgap) at the two sites was 1.5 and 2.2. The site with the smaller minimum gap size had taller surrounding residual trees and thus lower light levels, but had higher relative soil moisture and nutrients and was a younger age at the time of sampling. The largest gap size sampled in this study was relatively small (1.1 ha) and greater growth responses are likely in gaps larger than this. The results of this study suggest that gap sizes below a minimum will not create conditions to ensure adequate growth of Douglas-fir regeneration in group selection systems. In addition, only one group selection pass is examined here: under full implementation several group selection passes are envisaged leading to further changes in the gap-level environment throughout. Further work is needed to confirm the localized relationships found here including: greater replication across a range of site quality, sampling of larger gap sizes and examination of older ages of both regeneration and surround trees.

Keywords: group selection; size; growth; gap size

Journal Title: Forestry
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.