LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Psychometric Properties of Instruments Measuring Dyadic Communication and Environment in Dementia Care: A Systematic Review.

Photo by headwayio from unsplash

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A valid and reliable assessment of dementia dyadic communication and environment is essential to understand and facilitate social interaction and quality care. This review described the characteristics… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A valid and reliable assessment of dementia dyadic communication and environment is essential to understand and facilitate social interaction and quality care. This review described the characteristics and evaluated psychometric properties of instruments that assess dyadic communication and environment between persons living with dementia and their caregivers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guideline. Literature published until June 30 th, 2021, was searched. Ten psychometric properties and the ratio of sample size to the number of items were evaluated using the Psychometric Assessment for Self-report and Observational Tool. RESULTS A total of 3,708 scholarly records was identified, and 24 eligible instruments from 48 scholarly records were evaluated. Twenty-two instruments assessed dyadic communication, and two assessed both dyadic communication and environment. Eighteen instruments were developed to assess task-related communication and fifteen for paid (professional) caregivers. All instruments were scored as low psychometric quality (score range = 0 - 7). Behavioral Observation Scoring System was scored the highest (total score = 7), followed by Dyadic Dementia Coding System, Grid for observation of physical and verbal behaviors of caregiver and resident, and Trouble-Indicating Behaviors and Repair (total score = 6, respectively). These instruments had low psychometric evidence for internal consistency, content validity, and structural validity. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Existing instruments are in the early stages of development and validation in dementia population. Further testing is needed in diverse communication types in paid and unpaid dementia caregiver populations.

Keywords: communication environment; psychometric properties; communication; dyadic communication; dementia

Journal Title: The Gerontologist
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.