LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used?

Photo from wikipedia

Background: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) are increasingly used to assess the effectiveness of health interventions. Three main analysis approaches are: cluster-level analyses, mixed-models and generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Mixed models… Click to show full abstract

Background: Cluster randomised trials (CRTs) are increasingly used to assess the effectiveness of health interventions. Three main analysis approaches are: cluster-level analyses, mixed-models and generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Mixed models and GEEs can lead to inflated type I error rates with a small number of clusters, and numerous small-sample corrections have been proposed to circumvent this problem. However, the impact of these methods on power is still unclear. Methods: We performed a simulation study to assess the performance of 12 analysis approaches for CRTs with a continuous outcome and 40 or fewer clusters. These included weighted and unweighted cluster-level analyses, mixed-effects models with different degree-of-freedom corrections, and GEEs with and without a small-sample correction. We assessed these approaches across different values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), numbers of clusters, and variability in cluster sizes. Results: Unweighted and variance-weighted cluster-level analysis, mixed models with degree-offreedom corrections, and GEE with a small-sample correction all maintained the type I error rate at or below 5% across most scenarios, whereas uncorrected approaches lead to inflated type I error rates. However, these analyses had low power (below 50% in some scenarios) when fewer than 20 clusters were randomized, with none reaching the expected 80% power. Conclusion: Small-sample corrections or variance-weighted cluster-level analyses are recommended for the analysis of continuous outcomes in CRTs with a small number of clusters. The use of these corrections should be incorporated into the sample size calculation to prevent studies from being underpowered.

Keywords: number clusters; cluster level; small number; cluster; small sample

Journal Title: International journal of epidemiology
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.