LAUSR

Abstract Background Laboratory sampling is a significant source of error in feed testing. Proficiency testing programs such as the Association of American Feed Control Officials Proficiency Testing Program are an effective means of assessing error in and among analytical methods. However, all proficiency test items are comminuted and blended to control variability among items, effectively minimizing sampling error. Currently there is no mechanism for monitoring sampling error among laboratories. Objective The objective of this work was to investigate the feasibility of a proficiency testing program for laboratory sampling methods and provide insight into a program to advance the performance of sampling in laboratories. Methods The study involved the fabrication of identical feed test items from feed ingredients and shipping the uncomminuted materials to volunteer laboratories. The volunteer laboratories followed in-house procedures for selecting test portions for routine feed tests. Tests on all the test portions for a single analyte were performed by a single laboratory, so that the variability in test results could be attributed to laboratory sampling processes to select test portions. Results The average RSD, %, for Item A and Item B, respectively, were as follows: protein, 5.08 and 5.23; non-protein nitrogen, 8.90 and 16.6; crude fat, 3.45 and 5.67; vitamin A, 33.9 and 26.9; calcium, 21.9 and 23.6; zinc, 17.9 and 27.9; and copper, 17.4 and 27.9. Conclusion This study suggests that a proficiency testing program for laboratory sampling is feasible with manual manufacture of the test items, and data can be used to monitor laboratory sampling proficiency and also to compare the performance of different laboratory sampling methods. Highlights The data illustrates that each analyte has unique distributional and compositional heterogeneity, thus unique sampling error, even when multiple analytes are determined from a single test portion.