LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

347 Choosing an external marker for measuring intake and digestibility in ruminants

Photo by chaurasia from unsplash

Proper nutrition is key to maintaining and improving animal productivity. Measuring intake and site and extent of digestion is essential for appropriate diet formulation. However, it is extremely difficult to… Click to show full abstract

Proper nutrition is key to maintaining and improving animal productivity. Measuring intake and site and extent of digestion is essential for appropriate diet formulation. However, it is extremely difficult to accurately account for the dynamic nature of the ruminant digestive tract. External markers have long been used as a tool to measure digesta output, yet proper marker selection can be challenging. The aim of this review is to provide guidance in the selection of external markers in ruminant nutrition studies. External markers must satisfy certain requirements in order to be considered a valid marker. These requirements include, but are not limited to, being inert in the gastrointestinal tract, mixing with the digesta, and having high recovery rate in the feces. In addition, laboratory analysis needs to be easily reproducible within and amongst laboratories. Health hazards of the marker must also be kept in mind for the laboratory worker and the animal. There are a number of elements that have been utilized as external markers. Currently in the literature, chromic oxide (Cr2O3), long-chain alkanes (C32 to C36) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) are the most commonly used external markers. Each have been extensively evaluated and have their own positive and negative attributes. Results comparing fecal recoveries has been extensively reported in various diets fed to large and small ruminants. Of the three most widely utilized external markers, all have demonstrated adequate fecal recoveries, reasonable estimates of total duodenal and fecal digesta flows or output. Therefore, the selection of the appropriate marker comes down to the ease and accuracy at which analysis can be conducted, dosage rate, minimum dosage frequency, and safety to the user and animal.

Keywords: 347 choosing; measuring intake; external marker; external markers; marker; choosing external

Journal Title: Journal of Animal Science
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.