Beef heifers (n = 1524) from two operations in central Nebraska were randomly assigned to one of two treatments [0 or 5 μg GnRH at prostaglandin F2α (PGF) administration 72… Click to show full abstract
Beef heifers (n = 1524) from two operations in central Nebraska were randomly assigned to one of two treatments [0 or 5 μg GnRH at prostaglandin F2α (PGF) administration 72 hrs before insemination]. Both locations utilized MGA-PG fixed-time AI (TAI) estrus synchronization protocol. The first location (L1, n = 1076, 382 ± 3 kg) processed heifers 72 hours prior to insemination and every third heifer was assigned to receive an injection of GnRH (5 ug) (TRT) and an injection of PGF. The remaining heifers received PGF and 0 μg GnRH. At insemination all heifers received 100 ug GnRH. Heifers were then observed for estrus behavior from 10–21 days post TAI and re-inseminated if estrus was detected. Heifers pregnant from the second breeding were added to final pregnancy rate. The second location (L2) utilized estrus detection patches and performed only TAI (n = 448, 363 ± 7 kg) following MGA-PG synchronization protocol outlined above without the estrus observation period. Treatment did not significantly (P > 0.20) improve TAI pregnancy rates [L1 TAI 56.3% (TRT) vs 57.3%; L1 AI Total 78.3% (TRT) vs 73.9%; L2 TAI 58.5% (TRT) vs 52.5%] among the two herds. The administration of 5 μg GnRH at PGF tended to increase (P = 0.12, 74% vs 63%) pregnancy rates for those inseminated during the follow up heat detection period at L1. The treatment did not (P > 0.20) improve pregnancy for the time-AI heifers. In addition, TAI pregnancy rates were similar (P > 0.20) at L2. There were greater (P < 0.20) effect of pen on pregnancy rate.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.