LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

QOLP-33. ACCEPTABILITY RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL A COUPLES-BASED MIND-BODY INTERVENTION FOR PATIENTS WITH HIGH GRADE GLIOMA AND THEIR PARTNERS

Photo by ramaissance from unsplash

Given the incurable nature, short survival and high symptom burden of high grade glioma (HGG), patients and their partners are at risk of experiencing psychological and existential/spiritual distress. To address… Click to show full abstract

Given the incurable nature, short survival and high symptom burden of high grade glioma (HGG), patients and their partners are at risk of experiencing psychological and existential/spiritual distress. To address these concerns, we developed a dyadic intervention integrating meditation training with emotional disclosure exercises. The primary aim was to examine feasibility and acceptability of the intervention study procedures. Dyads completed baseline self-report measures and were randomized to a couple-based mind-body (CBMB) or a waitlist control (WLC) group. Couples in the CBMB groups attended 4 weekly (60 min each) therapist-led sessions that were delivered via FaceTime. The CBMB program focused on cultivating mindfulness, compassion, gratitude and purpose. All groups were reassessed, 1 month and 3 months after baseline. We approached 60 eligible patient-partner dyads of which 37 (62%) consented and 18 were randomized to the CBMB and 16 to the WLC group. Of those randomized, 23 dyads (67%) completed all assessments (n= 12 in CBMB; n=11 in WLC). Attrition was due to patients’ death (n=3), symptom burden (n=5) or passive withdrawal (n=3). Patients (57% male; mean age=57 years) and partners’ (59% female; mean age=54 years) attended a mean of 3.17 sessions (SD=1.2) with 83% attending at least 2 sessions. All dyads in the CBMB group reported the intervention as beneficial and useful and would recommend this program to other couples. Of note, 60% of couples would have preferred in-person delivery and 95% of patients but only 33% of partners stated that a dyadic intervention is their preference. It seems to be feasible, acceptable and possibly efficacious to deliver a dyadic intervention via FaceTime to couples coping with HGG. Although both members of the dyad reported to have benefited, dyadic delivery appears to be less desirable for partners.

Keywords: intervention; grade glioma; high grade; mind body; based mind

Journal Title: Neuro-Oncology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.