LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

A Novel Computational Approach in MATLAB to Characterize Thermal Damage Estimate in Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy

Photo from wikipedia

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that produces real-time thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. Measurements of TDE by hand across a… Click to show full abstract

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that produces real-time thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. Measurements of TDE by hand across a full ablation can be time-consuming, and currently, no reliable image analysis exists for measuring TDE dimensions efficiently. Ablations were performed with the Visualase MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System (Medtronic). Selection criteria included single-laser catheter use and available ablation data in 2 planes. Central TDE lengths and widths postsingle ablation dose were calculated using our developed MATLAB algorithm and compared to manual measurements by 2 raters. The Bland-Altman model and Student's t-tests were used to characterize value differences between the 2 methods. A total of 42 TDE images across 21 patients were included. The mean differences in TDE length for rater 1 vs algorithm, rater 2 vs algorithm, and rater 1 vs rater 2 were −0.12 mm (SEM = 0.18), −0.54 mm (SEM = 0.17), and 0.42 mm (SEM = 0.17), respectively. The mean difference in TDE width for rater 1 vs algorithm, rater 2 vs algorithm, and rater 1 vs rater 2 were 0.45 mm (SEM = 0.16), −0.46 mm (SEM = 0.16), and 0.91 mm (SEM = 0.12), respectively. For both lengths and widths, student's t-tests show no significance differences across rater 1 and rater 2 vs algorithm (P > .1) and between raters (P > .05). Our iterative algorithm provides a reliable method for calculating TDE dimensions. Compared to manual measurements, the differences in TDE length and width are negligible. This computational tool allows for measurement of TDE for large sets of MRgLITT data within minutes.

Keywords: guided laser; sem; magnetic resonance; rater; rater algorithm

Journal Title: Neurosurgery
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.