LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

506. Variation in Occupational Activities and Infection Prevention Practices in Healthcare Personnel Based on Exposure to COVID-19 Units

Photo from wikipedia

Background: Healthcare personnel (HCP) may be at increased risk for COVID-19, but differences in risk by work activities are poorly defined Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends cohorting hospitalized… Click to show full abstract

Background: Healthcare personnel (HCP) may be at increased risk for COVID-19, but differences in risk by work activities are poorly defined Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends cohorting hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to reduce in-hospital transmission of SARS-CoV-2, but it is unknown if occupational and non-occupational behaviors differ based on exposure to COVID-19 units Methods: We analyzed a subset of HCP from an ongoing CDC-funded SARSCoV- 2 serosurveillance study HCP were recruited from four Atlanta hospitals of different sizes and patient populations All HCP completed a baseline REDCap survey We used logistic regression to compare occupational activities and infection prevention practices among HCP stratified by exposure to COVID-19 units: low (0% of shifts), medium (1-49% of shifts) or high (≥50% of shifts) Results: Of 211 HCP enrolled (36% emergency department [ED] providers, 35% inpatient RNs, 17% inpatient MDs/APPs, 7% radiology technicians and 6% respiratory therapists [RTs]), the majority (79%) were female and the median age was 35 years Nearly half of the inpatient MD/APPs (46%) and RNs (47%) and over two-thirds of the RTs (67%) worked primarily in the ICU Aerosol generating procedures were common among RNs, MD/APPs, and RTs (26-58% performed ≥1), but rare among ED providers (0-13% performed ≥1) Compared to HCP with low exposure to COVID-19 units, those with medium or high exposure spent a similar proportion of shifts directly at the bedside and were about as likely to practice universal masking Being able to consistently social distance from co-workers was rare (33%);HCP with high exposure to COVID-19 units were less likely to report social distancing in the workplace compared to those with low exposure;however, this was not significantly different (OR 0 6;95% CI: 0 3, 1 1) Concerns about personal protective equipment in COVID-19 units were similar across levels of exposure (Table 1) Conclusion: The proportion of time spent in dedicated COVID-19 units did not appear to influence time HCP spend directly at the bedside or infection prevention practices (social distancing and universal masking) in the workplace Risk for SARSCoV- 2 infection in HCP may depend more on factors acting at the individual level rather than those related to location of work (Table Presented)

Keywords: infection prevention; exposure covid; exposure; covid units

Journal Title: Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.