LAUSR

Abstract Background Recent clinical trial evidence supports broader use of partial oral therapy (POT) for infective endocarditis (IE), yet real-world uptake in the U.S. has not been investigated. Methods Adult infectious diseases (ID) physician members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network were surveyed in April–May 2025. A 10-item instrument captured frequency of POT, organism-specific influence, decision factors, barriers, and facilitators. Results Among 1531 members, 516 (34%) responded; 452 (88%) of them managed IE. POT was uncommon: 16% never used, 53% used in ≤10% of cases, and only 10% used in >25% of patients. Frequent POT rose with caseload (23% in physicians treating >50 IE cases year vs ≤9% in lower-volume groups, P < .001) and with fewer years in clinical practice (13% in <5 yrs vs 5% in ≥25 yrs, P = .013). Comfort with POT depended on the pathogen: 66% were comfortable switching for Streptococcus spp., 52% for Gram-negative bacilli, 19% for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Three quarters of those who used POT finished with a single agent. In people who inject drugs, 34% of physicians often or always considered an oral regimen. Availability of an active oral agent (75%) and the pathogen involved (69%) were the leading decision drivers; principal barriers were fear of relapse (72%), adherence concerns (53%), and insufficient evidence (48%). Respondents most desired clearer guidelines (75%) and additional data (71%). Conclusions U.S. adult ID physicians adopt POT for IE sparingly. Updated IE treatment guidelines, additional clinical trial data, and broader access to complex outpatient antimicrobial therapy services may facilitate wider adoption.