LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Response to Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Among Patients Co-Infected with HIV and HCV: Real-world Data in a Black Population

Photo by schluditsch from unsplash

Abstract Background Treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection for patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) has improved with direct acting antivirals (DAAs). However, outcomes among Black persons treated with… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Background Treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection for patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) has improved with direct acting antivirals (DAAs). However, outcomes among Black persons treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) may be inferior to non-Blacks. We assessed responses to LDV/SOF in a cohort of Black HIV/HCV co-infected persons in Newark, New Jersey. Methods Retrospective chart reviews were conducted for Black, genotype 1 (GT1), HIV/HCV co-infected patients treated with LDV/SOF at three hospitals in Newark, New Jersey between January 2014 and July 2016. Data collected included demographics, HCV treatment history, treatment duration and response. Results 117 HIV/HCV co-infected Black patients started treatment with LDV/SOF but 5 had no follow up data and 5 prematurely discontinued treatment (1 due to side effects). We included 107 HIV/HCV co-infected patients who completed LDV/SOF at all three sites. The study population was 65% male, median age 58 years, 26% had cirrhosis and 77% had GT1a. 31% were treatment experienced but none with prior NS5a treatment. At baseline, median CD4 count was 680 cells/mm3, HIV viral load (VL) was < 40 in 94% and median HCV VL was 2257403 IU/ml. 29% of patients changed antiretroviral treatment (ART) before LDV/SOF treatment due to drug interactions (Table-1).Table-1: ART changes prior to LDV/SOF treatment Regimen Baseline(N = 107) Switched(N = 31) Switched to Final prior to treatment
(N = 107) Integrase inhibitor (INSTI) 48 10 INSTI 65 Protease inhibitor (PI) 28 14 INSTI 14 Included efavirenz 12 3 INSTI 5 4 Other Other 19 0 - 23 6, 89, and 12 patients completed 8, 12, and 24 weeks of LDV/SOF respectively. Table-2 shows details of our sustained virologic response (SVR) data.Table-2: SVR12 Rates by Treatment Duration and ART class SVR12 Rates Relapse Overall 93% 7/107 By duration 8 weeks 67% 2/6 12 weeks 96% 4/89 24 weeks 92% 1/12 By ART Class INSTI 95% 3/65 PI 93% 1/14 Included efavirenz 80% 1/5 Other 91% 2/23 Conclusion In this real-world cohort of Black, GT1, HIV/HCV co-infected patients, LDV/SOF had high SVR12 rate of 93%. However, there were not enough patients in the 8 week arm to assess its efficacy. This data supports the overall high efficacy of LDV/SOF in a difficult-to-treat patient population. Disclosures J. Slim, Gilead: CME/CE, Consultant, Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium; Abbvie: CME/CE, Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium; Merck: CME/CE, Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium; ViiV: CME/CE, Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium; Janssen: CME/CE and Consultant, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium; BMS: CME/CE, Speaker honorarium S. Swaminathan, Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant

Keywords: ldv sof; treatment; speaker; hiv hcv; consulting fee

Journal Title: Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.