OBJECTIVE To describe recommendations made by an interdisciplinary controlled substance committee and acceptance by primary care providers. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Multisite federally qualified health center using an interdisciplinary… Click to show full abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe recommendations made by an interdisciplinary controlled substance committee and acceptance by primary care providers. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Multisite federally qualified health center using an interdisciplinary committee to provide patient-specific recommendations to prescribers with patients using prescription opioids and other controlled substances. SUBJECTS Patients prescribed long-term opioids. METHODS We identified and characterized committee recommendations to prescribers between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. We manually reviewed electronic medical records to determine if recommendations were accepted at eight months. The primary outcome was the overall acceptance rate of recommendations. Secondary outcomes were the acceptance of recommendations to reduce opioid doses and change in opioid dose from baseline. RESULTS The committee made 337 recommendations for 94 patients. Of those, 169 recommendations (50.1%) were accepted within eight months. The most common recommendation was to change opioid prescribing (Nā=ā53, 56.4%), but recommendations varied. For patients with a recommendation to change opioid prescribing, this was accepted in 31 of 53 patients (58.5%). Overall, opioid doses decreased from 60 morphine equivalents per day (interquartile range [IQR] = 27.5-135, range = 5-1,260) at baseline to 40 morphine equivalents per day (IQR = 15-105, range = 0-1,260) at eight months (Pā<ā0.001). CONCLUSIONS An interdisciplinary committee was well positioned to offer primary care providers with nonopioid options to manage chronic nonmalignant pain and provide support in reducing opioid doses. About half of recommendations were accepted by primary care providers. Future research should focus on strategies to improve the utility of this approach and its impact on clinical outcomes.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.