LAUSR

OBJECTIVE This study is a sub-analysis from the patient cohort of the STARTER (Sonographic Tenosynovitis Assessment in RheumaToid arthritis patiEnts in Remission) study. The aim was to evaluate differences in ultrasound-detected joint and/or tendon involvement between patients receiving therapies based on a combination of csDMARDs and bDMARDs and those who were treated with either csDMARDs or bDMARDs in monotherapy. METHODS 427 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis were recruited between October 2013 and June 2014.They were divided into 3 subgroups based on their therapy at baseline: patients with bDMARDs in monotherapy, patients with csDMARDs in monotherapy, patients in combination therapy (csDMARD+bDMARD). At baseline, 6 months and 12 months, a clinical examination (28 joint count), an ultrasound evaluation were performed in each patient. A score of Grey Scale (GS) and Power Doppler (PD)-synovitis and -tenosynovitis, was calculated based on the OMERACT scoring systems. RESULTS 256 patients completed the observation period: 48 patients from the bDMARDs group (19.7%), 152 patients from the csDMARDs group (59.1%) and 56 pts from csDMARD+bDMARD group (21.8%).The analysis has shown that GS-tenosynovitis and PD-tenosynovitis are better controlled in combination therapy than they are with csDMARDs alone (p:0.025 and p:0.047, respectively); for PD synovitis, there was a better response in those who were treated with the combination therapy when compared to the patients in csDMARD (p:0.01) and those in bDMARD (p:0.02). CONCLUSION The analysis showed a lower prevalence of subclinical inflammatory manifestations detected with ultrasound imaging in those patients treated with the combination therapy than in those in monotherapy.