LAUSR

Abstract Two hundred and forty barrows and gilts (DNA 600 × 241, DNA Genetics, Columbus, NE) with an initial body weight (BW) of 35.5 ± 4.2 kg were sorted into split-sex pens, blocked by initial body weight, and randomly allocated to one of three dietary treatments with eight pigs per pen and ten pens per treatment. Dietary treatments included a standard diet (CON), CON plus 0.3% benzoic acid (BA; VevoVitall, DSM Nutritional Products, Parsippany, NJ), and CON plus 0.3% BA and 0.025% Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial (BA+DFM; PureGro, DSM Nutritional Products, Parsippany, NJ). The experimental diets were fed in four feeding phases. Pigs were weighed and feed intake measured at the beginning and end of each phase for the calculation of average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed efficiency (G:F). In addition, ultra-sound was utilized at the conclusion of the trial on day 81 for measurements of backfat and loin eye area. Data were analyzed as repeated measures in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) with fixed effects of treatment, phase, sex, and block included in the model. Pen was the experimental unit, and results were considered significant if P ≤ 0.05 and a tendency if 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10. Overall, pigs fed BA had increased ADFI compared to pigs fed CON (2.88 vs. 2.75 kg, P = 0.015), while pigs fed BA + DFM had similar ADFI compared to pigs fed CON or BA (P ≥ 0.279). There was a tendency for an effect of dietary treatment on ADG (P = 0.063), where pigs fed BA tended to grow faster than pigs fed CON (1.11 vs. 1.08 kg, P = 0.051); however, there were no differences in feed efficiency between treatments (P = 0.450). Additionally, there was no evidence of an effect of dietary treatment on pig BF or LEA (P ≥ 0.334). In conclusion, supplementing 0.3% benzoic acid to grow-finish pigs stimulated feed intake, but did not affect efficiency, or carcass merit.