LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

IMPAIRED SKIN MICROCIRCULATION DYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: ASSOCIATION WITH ARTERIAL STIFFNESS AND CORONARY MICROVASCULAR PERFUSION

Photo by curology from unsplash

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by excess cardiovascular risk. Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) is a novel and highly reproducible technique for the real-time evaluation of skin microcirculation. However,… Click to show full abstract

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by excess cardiovascular risk. Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) is a novel and highly reproducible technique for the real-time evaluation of skin microcirculation. However, relevant data using non-invasive laser techniques remain far too limited in RA, especially in patients free from cardiovascular risk factors with relatively suppressed inflammatory load. Design and method: We assessed skin microvascular function in a well-characterized sample of RA patients free from hypertension and cardiovascular diseases with low levels of systemic inflammation, compared to non-RA individuals. Microvascular function was dynamically evaluated using LSCI coupled with a post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia protocol. Applanation tonometry with the Sphygmocor device was applied to assess a) subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) or Buckberg index as a functional marker of microvascular myocardial perfusion, b) carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a marker of macrovascular dysfunction. Results: We studied 35 patients with RA at remission or low disease activity, and 35 controls matched for cardiovascular risk factors. Skin microvascular responses were impaired in RA patients compared to controls, specifically baseline flux [46.8(18.9) vs 36.4(13.9) LSPUs, p < 0.001], occlusion flux [12.4(13.5) vs 7.0(3.6) LSPUs, p = 0.001], time-to-peak [7.0(0.4) vs 11.0(8) sec, p < 0.001], peak magnitude [113.1(25.4) vs 99.1(32.5) LSPUs, p = 0.017], peak-to-baseline magnitude [136.5(75.2) vs 172.1(65.9) %, p = 0.014], baseline cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) (0.54 ± 0.15 vs 0.44 ± 0.14 LSPUs/mmHg, p = 0.006), and percentage increase in CVC [139.5(75.3) vs 172.1(67.3) %, p = 0.011]. Moreover, SEVR was lower in RA patients compared to controls (140.6 ± 21.8 vs 157.2 ± 25.2%, p = 0.046), whereas PWV did not significantly differ. SEVR strongly and significantly correlated with nearly all LSCI indices (baseline and occlusion flux, peak magnitude, peak-to-baseline magnitude, baseline CVC, and percentage CVC increase). PWV significantly correlated only with baseline flux, occlusion flux, and time-to-peak. Conclusions: Microcirculation dynamics appear impaired even in RA patients with relatively low inflammatory load, regardless of cardiovascular risk factors. Importantly, we showed for the first time an association between impaired skin microvascular dynamics assessed with LSCI and microvascular myocardial perfusion using SEVR. Further studies need to evaluate the prognostic potential of LSCI in terms of cardiovascular risk in RA.

Keywords: skin microcirculation; rheumatoid arthritis; risk; perfusion; cardiovascular risk

Journal Title: Journal of Hypertension
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.