LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Large Volume Intraoperative Fluid Use in Small

Photo from wikipedia

Introduction With advances in surgical and medical transplantation, progressively younger children are being transplanted. There is no consensus and little evidence on the optimal intraoperative fluid volume/type and inotropic support… Click to show full abstract

Introduction With advances in surgical and medical transplantation, progressively younger children are being transplanted. There is no consensus and little evidence on the optimal intraoperative fluid volume/type and inotropic support in small recipients (<20kg). This study provides insight into the differences in intraoperative fluid and inotropic support use between small and large recipients (20>kg). Methods Patients transplanted between 2014 and 2017 were identifed from a local transplant database at the UK's largest pediatric transplant centre. We compared the volume of fluid required (mean percentage of dry weight), type of fluid used and inotropes required intraoperatively between the groups. Student's T-test and FIsher's test were used for analysis. Further analysis on <20kg group assessed the impact of intraoperative management on post-operative outcomes such as lenght of PICU admission and dependence on inotropic support post-operatively. Results Twenty-five small recipients (mean weight 14.9kg, SD 2.7kg) were compared with twenty-five large recipients (mean weight 48.6kg, SD 21.9). Small recipients received significantly higher volumes of fluid than large recipients (mean 15.4% (SD 7.5%) vs 6.8% (SD 2.4%), p<0.001) and received significantly more colloids intra-operatively (70% vs 25%, p-0.003). Mean fluid requirement for small recipients was 154ml/kg (range 63.7-333.3ml/kg) compared with 67.5ml/kg (range 32.6-114.3ml/kg) for large recipients. 96% of small recipients required intraoperative inotropes compared to 83% large recipients (not statistically significant, p=0.142). Mean stay at pediatric intesive care unit for small recipients was 66.3hours (SD 110.2) with mean dependence on inotropic support being 24.5 hours (SD 19.6 hours). Death-censored graft survival was 100% at 1 year (1 patient died from sepsis eight months post transplant). Conclusion This data suggest that small recipients require larger volumes of intraoperative fluid and more colloids than large recipients. It also confirms that large fluid volume and colloids are well tolerated by this group with excellent post-operative outcomes.

Keywords: intraoperative fluid; inotropic support; volume; fluid; large recipients; small recipients

Journal Title: Transplantation
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.