LAUSR

Purpose Health professions education and practice have seen renewed calls to restore compassion to care. However, because of the ways evidence-based practice (EBP) has been implemented in health care, wherein research-based knowledge is privileged, the dominance of EBP may silence clinician and patient experience-based knowledge needed for compassionate care. This study explored what happens when the discourses of compassionate care and EBP interact in practice. Method Chronic pain management in Canada was selected as the context for the study. Data collection involved compiling an archive of 458 chronic pain texts, including gray literature from 2009–2015 (non-peer-reviewed sources, e.g., guidelines), patient blog posts from 2013–2015, and transcripts of study interviews with 9 clinicians and postgraduate trainees from local pain clinics from 2015–2016. The archive was analyzed using an interpretive qualitative approach informed by critical discourse analysis. Results Four manifestations of the discourse of compassionate care were identified: curing the pain itself, returning to function, alleviating suffering, and validating the patient experience. These discourses produced particular subject positions, activities, practices, and privileged forms of knowledge. They operated in response, partnership, apology, and resistance, respectively, to the dominant discourse of EBP. These relationships were mediated by other prevalent discourses in the system: patient safety, patient-centered care, professional liability, interprofessional collaboration, and efficiency. Conclusions Medical education efforts to foster compassion in health professionals and systems need to acknowledge the complex web of discourses—which carry with them their own expectations, material effects, and roles—and support people in navigating this web.