LAUSR

Purpose of review The concept of quality improvement (QI) is well implemented in pediatric anesthesia. Conductance, reporting and publishing of QI projects and -results is well described and promoted. However, the perception of quality might differ between stakeholders and beneficiaries. Based on measures of quality as perceived by healthcare professionals and pediatric patients, a pragmatic approach to choosing the relevant quality measure is suggested. Recent findings Design of QI projects is often motivated by an incentive to avoid errors and adverse events, and with an overall aim to reduce morbidity and mortality. From a patient- and parent point of view, avoidance of perioperative stress and anxiety might be a priority measure of quality. Summary In an attempt to embrace both perspectives of quality in pediatric anesthesia care, it is suggested to choose quality items for improvement based on patient safety, professional excellency and benignancy. By following this approach, QI is expected to remain relevant to both healthcare professionals and patients.