LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Effect of Nail Size, Insertion, and Δ Canal-Nail on the Development of a NonUnion after Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures.

Photo by domenika from unsplash

OBJECTIVE To determine if intramedullary nail (IMN) diameter, antegrade vs retrograde insertion, or the difference between the canal and IMN diameter affect femoral shaft fracture healing. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine if intramedullary nail (IMN) diameter, antegrade vs retrograde insertion, or the difference between the canal and IMN diameter affect femoral shaft fracture healing. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of a prospective database SETTING:: Level One Regional Trauma CenterPatients/Participants: 733 femoral shaft fractures (OTA/AO 32) treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN) between 1999 and 2017. After exclusion criteria, 484 fractures remained in the final analysis. INTERVENTION closed section, cannulated, interlocked, titanium alloy IMN using a reamed insertion technique MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:: Nonunion, IMN size (10, 11.5, 13 mm), antegrade vs retrograde insertion, Δ Canal-Nail Diameter (ΔD) after reaming (<1 mm, 1 to 2 mm or >2 mm) RESULTS:: IMN diameters used were: 314/10-mm (64%), 137/11.5-mm (28%), and 33/13-mm (8%). 45% were placed in antegrade vs 55% retrograde. 456 fractures (94.2%) healed uneventfully. There were no IMN failures. 10/484 IMNs (2%) had broken interlocking screws; only 4 were associated with a NU. Average time to union was 23 weeks (12-119). 28 (5.8%) developed NU. There was no statistical correlation between: A) the NU rate and IMN diameter: 10-mm, 6.3%; 11.5-mm, 5.1%; 13-mm, 3% (P = 0.8, power = 0.85), B) the NU rate and ΔD: 7.1% <1 mm, 5.6% 1-2 mm, 20% >2 mm (P = 0.36), C) the NU rate and fracture location: Prox = 11%, Mid = 5.%, Dist = 3% (P = 0.13), or D) the NU rate and antegrade (7.2%) vs retrograde (4.2%) insertion (P = 0.24). CONCLUSION Similar healing rates occurred regardless of IMN diameter, Δ canal-nail diameter after reaming, or insertion site. This indicates that a closed section, cannulated, interlocked, titanium alloy IMN with a diameter of 10 mm can be considered the standard diameter for the treatment of acute femoral shaft fractures, regardless of entry point. This should be associated with less reaming and therefore shorter operative times, and possibly less hospital implant inventories as well. Larger diameter IMN should be reserved for revision surgery.

Keywords: diameter; nail; imn; femoral shaft; insertion

Journal Title: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.