LAUSR

OBJECTIVES To determine whether fracture pattern, implant size, fixation direction, or the amount of posterior pelvic ring fixation influences superior ramus medullary screw fixation failure. DESIGN Retrospective cohort review. SETTING Regional Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS After exclusion criteria, 95 patients with 111 superior ramus fractures with 3 months minimum follow-up were included. INTERVENTION All patients underwent anterior and posterior pelvic ring fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Comparison of immediate postoperative radiographs and/or CT scan with the latest postoperative image to calculate interval fracture displacement and implant position. Postoperative fracture displacement or implant position change greater than 1 cm were considered fixation failures. RESULTS 5 screws were defined as failures (4.5%) including 3 retrograde, 3 with bicortical fixation, 4 with a 4.5 mm screw, and one with a 7.0 mm screw. Fracture patterns included 2 oblique and 3 comminuted fractures. Based on the Nakatani classification, there were 3 zone II, 1 zone I, and one zone III. Failure modes included 3 with cut-out along the screw head and 1 cut-out and 1 cut-through at the screw tip. CONCLUSIONS Our incidence of superior pubic ramus intramedullary screw fixation failure was 4.5%. Even with anterior and posterior fixation along with precise technique, failures still occur without a common failure predictor. The percutaneous advantages and proven strength provided by an intramedullary implant make it desirable to help reestablish global pelvic ring stability. Biomechanical and clinical studies are needed to further understand intramedullary superior ramus screw fixation LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.