LAUSR

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To determine the demographic characteristics and clinical and radiologic results of low transcondylar fractures and compare them with those of other types of distal humerus fractures using multicenter data and to suggest an optimal method for their treatment. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary-care university hospital. Patients: Between 2009 and 2019, 581 patients who underwent surgery for distal humerus fractures (OTA/AO classification A1 to C3) were enrolled at 7 university-affiliated hospitals. Intervention: Internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures. Main Outcome Measures: Demographic characteristics, including sex, age, mechanism of injury, fixation methods, and complications, were compared between low transcondylar (group A) and other distal humerus (group B) fractures. Clinical outcomes assessed included pain, stability, and range of motion. Radiographs obtained at the latest follow-up were assessed for union, delayed union, nonunion, and implant failure. Results: Mean age was 62.1 ± 19.1 (range, 20–95) years, and it was higher in group A (n = 100) than in group B (n = 376). Patients in group A were predominantly women. Low-energy trauma, such as that from a simple fall, was the most common cause of fracture in group A. Both column fixation, including parallel and orthogonal double plating, was performed more commonly in group A than in group B (87.4% vs. 66.4%, P < 0.001). The nonunion rate was higher in group A, but the difference was not significant. The incidence of ulnar nerve–related symptoms was higher in group A after surgery (6.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.003). No significant difference in clinical outcomes was found between the groups. Conclusions: Low transcondylar fractures occurred more frequently than other distal humerus fractures in older female patients and accounted for 21% of distal humerus fractures. The incidence of ulnar nerve–related symptoms was higher in patients with low transcondylar fractures after surgery. Clinical outcomes were not inferior in patients with low transcondylar fractures. The nonunion rate in patients with low transcondylar fractures treated with double plating was 3.6%. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.