Background: The association of scoliosis and congenital limb deficiency has been well described. However, the incidence of neural axis abnormalities in this population is not known. The ability to assess… Click to show full abstract
Background: The association of scoliosis and congenital limb deficiency has been well described. However, the incidence of neural axis abnormalities in this population is not known. The ability to assess the neural axis by physical examination may be limited in patients with a limb deficiency. Although mobility of the spine is important for all children, it can be especially so in children with a limb deficiency. As spinal fusion in children with limb deficiency potentially has more functional impact, detecting reversible forms of scoliosis seems particularly important. Methods: Retrospective review of children treated at 1 institution between 1990 and 2017 with both a diagnosis of a congenital limb deficiency, upper or lower, and scoliosis. Children were excluded if they had any neurological difference on history or physical examination, if they had sacral agenesis or spina bifida, or if their limb deficiency was related to trauma or early amniotic rupture sequence. Results: Twenty-four children were identified, 11 with lower extremity deficiency, 14 with upper extremity deficiency with 1 having both. Fifteen children demonstrated neural axis abnormalities, 6 (40%) required neurosurgery. Five (45%) of 11 lower extremity deficiency children had MRI findings, 3 of these needing neurosurgery. Of the 14 upper extremity deficiency children, 10 had MRI changes, and 3 required neurosurgery. Eight children with congenital scoliosis, 5 had MRI findings, with 4 children requiring neurosurgery. The other 16 children had scoliosis without vertebral abnormalities, 10 had MRI findings, and 2 required neurosurgery. Conclusions: There is a high incidence of neural axis abnormalities (63%) in children with congenital limb deficiencies and scoliosis. A large portion of these require neurosurgical intervention. MRI should be considered soon after presentation in this population of children. Level of Evidence: Level IV. Design: Retrospective cohort.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.