LAUSR

Background: Elastic intramedullary nails (EINs) are the treatment of choice for school-age children (5 to 12) with diaphyseal femur fractures. Previous literature suggests that EINs are an effective treatment for stable fracture patterns, but may be inadequate for unstable fracture patterns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patients with length unstable fractures had a higher complication rate than those with length stable fractures when treated with EINs. Methods: All patients with diaphyseal femur fractures treated with EINs over a 22-year period at a single institution were reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had a pathologic fracture, neuromuscular disorder, spinal cord injury with subsequent involvement of affected limb, metabolic bone disease, or if they did not have at least 6-month follow-up. Results: A total of 85 patients with 87 diaphyseal femur fractures treated with EINs were included in the study. In all, 57.5% of the fractures were categorized as length stable and 42.5% were length unstable. Fourteen percent of length stable patients had a residual angular deformity compared with 5.4% of the length unstable group (P=0.24). The length unstable group experienced more shortening at the fracture site than the patients in the length stable group (P=0.003), but no patient required further intervention for their shortening. Two patients in the length stable group experienced overgrowth >2 cm and required subsequent surgery. No relationship was observed between fracture pattern and frequency of complications (length stable 8% vs. length unstable 10.8%, P=0.69). Finally, the knee immobilizer group (10.7%) and the long leg cast group (18.2%) had significantly higher complication rates than the single leg spica cast group (0%, P<0.05). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in complication rate between length stable and unstable fractures treated with EINs. Adjunctive spica casting may be protective against postoperative complications. While fracture shortening was more likely in the length unstable group, it did not result in increased rate of limb length discrepancy at final follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Case Series.