LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison of Perioperative Complications in Anterior Decompression with Fusion and Posterior Decompression with Fusion for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nation-Wide Inpatient Database.

Photo from wikipedia

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE To compare the perioperative complications and costs of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) for patients with cervical… Click to show full abstract

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE To compare the perioperative complications and costs of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Surgical treatment of cervical OPLL has a high risk of various complications. ADF and PDF are effective for the treatment of cervical OPLL; however, few studies have compared the two procedures in terms of the perioperative surgical complications. METHODS Patients undergoing ADF and PDF for cervical OPLL from 2010 to 2016 were identified in a nation-wide inpatient database. We investigated systemic and local complications, length of hospital stay, costs for hospitalization, reoperation, and mortality. Propensity score was calculated from patients' characteristics and preoperative comorbidities, and one to one matching was performed. RESULTS Propensity score-matching produced 854 pairs of patients who underwent ADF and PDF. The rate of at least one systemic complication was significantly higher in the ADF group (p = 0.004). The incidence rates of postoperative respiratory failure (p = 0.034) and dysphagia (p = 0.008) were significantly higher in the ADF group. The rates of pneumonia (p = 0.06) and hoarseness (p = 0.08) also tended to be higher in the ADF group. However, no difference was found in the mortality rate (p = 0.22). In the local complications, spinal fluid leakage was significantly higher in the ADF group (p < 0.001). However, blood transfusion rate was significantly higher in the PDF group (p = 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the PDF group (p < 0.001) and the cost for hospitalization was greater in the PDF group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrated that perioperative complications, such as respiratory failure, dysphagia, and spinal fluid leakage, were more common in the ADF group. However, hospital stay was longer in the PDF group, and the cost for hospitalization was greater in the PDF group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.

Keywords: propensity score; perioperative complications; decompression fusion; group

Journal Title: Spine
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.