STUDY DESIGN A retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the clinical and radiological results of using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws versus traditional pedicle (TP) screws in transforaminal lumbar… Click to show full abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the clinical and radiological results of using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws versus traditional pedicle (TP) screws in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) during a 5-year follow-up of patients with single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Few studies have compared 5-year follow-up outcomes between CBT screws and TP screws in TLIF. METHODS We reviewed outcome data of patients with single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent TLIF procedures with CBT screws (131 patients) or TP screws (80 patients) between 2011 and 2015. Patient-reported clinical outcome data included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively. The radiographic fusion rate and prevalence of secondary surgery for adjacent segment disease were also measured. RESULTS During the follow-up over 5 years, the CBT group had significantly lower VAS scores for back pain (P<0.0001, respectively). At 2 years after surgery, the CBT group had significantly higher VAS scores for leg pain (P=.007). At 5 years postoperatively, no significant differences existed in the VAS score for leg pain or in the ODI score between the two groups. Radiographic fusion rates (CBT vs. TP: 95.5% vs. 95.9%; P=0.881) and adverse events during the 5 years after surgery were not significantly different. At 2 years postoperatively, the prevalence of secondary surgery to treat adjacent segment disease was significantly different between the two groups (CBT vs. TP: 13.7% vs. 5.0%; P=0.044). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that, during a 5-year follow-up, CBT screws for TLIF were an effective treatment, compared to TP screws, for patients with single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, when performing CBT screws for TLIF, surgeons should consider a symptomatic adjacent segment disease requiring surgery.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.