LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reply Letter to Robertson et al.

Photo from wikipedia

There are several flaws that do not allow for the conclusions drawn to be made. The primary flaw is a short follow-upduration. Smeets and colleagueshavepublished 10-year follow-up data, which demonstrate… Click to show full abstract

There are several flaws that do not allow for the conclusions drawn to be made. The primary flaw is a short follow-upduration. Smeets and colleagueshavepublished 10-year follow-up data, which demonstrate that 56% of recurrences occurred after more than 5-year follow-up. Presenting 3-year follow-up data to justify standard excision for incompletely excised NMSC is therefore meaningless. The same article also demonstrates 10-year recurrence rates of 12.2% for patients randomized to standard excision compared with 4.4% forMohs micrographic surgery (MMS) (note the study is unfairly biased in favor of standard excision (24 of 301 patients randomized to surgical excision were treated withMMS).

Keywords: letter robertson; reply letter; excision; year; standard excision; year follow

Journal Title: Dermatologic Surgery
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.