Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. BACKGROUND Radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) and nonablative fractional 1,550-nm erbium:glass lasers (NAFLs) have been reported to be used with success in neck rejuvenation.… Click to show full abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. BACKGROUND Radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) and nonablative fractional 1,550-nm erbium:glass lasers (NAFLs) have been reported to be used with success in neck rejuvenation. There are no head-to-head trials to compare these modalities. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency microneedling and nonablative fractional 1,550-nm erbium:glass lasers for the rejuvenation of the neck. METHODS This was a single-center, randomized, investigator-blinded clinical trial. A total of 21 subjects were randomized into 2 groups, NAFL and RFMN; subjects received 3 treatments 4 weeks apart and were followed up 12 weeks after last treatment. RESULTS Subjects in NAFL and RFMN groups showed 42.1% and 8.6% improvement in the Fitzpatrick–Goldman Wrinkling Score, respectively, 41.3% and 16.3% improvement in the elastosis score, respectively. Subjects in the NAFL 1,550-nm erbium:glass group showed significantly better blinded investigator Fitzpatrick–Goldman Wrinkling and Elastosis scores; subjects in the RFMN groups showed a more significant reduction in the Horizontal Neck Wrinkle Severity Score. There was a trend for higher patient satisfaction with the NAFL. CONCLUSION This study showed that both treatments resulted in significant improvement in wrinkling and elastosis scores; the NAFL treatment was associated with significantly better blinded investigator Fitzpatrick–Goldman Wrinkling and Elastosis scores and better subject satisfaction.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.