LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Immunosuppressive Drug-Associated Adverse Event Profiles in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses.

Photo from wikipedia

PURPOSE The safety of immunosuppressive regimens is influenced by the induction agent, maintenance drug combination, and prophylactic strategy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Herein, this safety analysis compares rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin… Click to show full abstract

PURPOSE The safety of immunosuppressive regimens is influenced by the induction agent, maintenance drug combination, and prophylactic strategy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Herein, this safety analysis compares rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) or basiliximab (BAS) combined with everolimus (EVR) versus BAS combined with mycophenolate sodium (MPS) in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, prednisone, and preemptive CMV therapy. METHODS In this single-center, prospective, randomized study, adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), viral infections, laboratory abnormalities, dose reductions, and temporary or permanent discontinuation of the immunosuppressant were compared among patients receiving r-ATG/EVR (n=85), BAS/EVR (n=102), and BAS/MPS (n=101). RESULTS A total of 2741 AEs and 344 SAEs were observed. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with at least one AE (96% vs 98% vs 96%, respectively, p>0.05). The proportion of patients with at least one SAE was highest in the BAS/MPS group (33% vs 48% vs 69%, respectively, p<0.05). This difference was due primarily to a high incidence of CMV infection in the BAS/MPS group (4.7% vs 10.8% vs 37.6%, respectively). The incidence of mild/moderate abnormalities in creatinine, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels was higher in both EVR groups. The cumulative freedom from dose reduction or treatment discontinuation due to an AE was higher in both EVR groups than in the BAS/MPS group (89.2% vs 92.8% vs 76.3%, respectively, p=0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (9.4% vs 18.6 vs 15.8%, respectively, p=0.403). CONCLUSION This analysis suggests that r-ATG induction combined with EVR is associated with a comparable incidence of acute rejection, lower incidence of CMV infection, and fewer changes in initial immunosuppressive regimen due to AEs in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, prednisone, and preemptive CMV therapy.

Keywords: recipients receiving; kidney transplant; transplant recipients; bas; drug; cmv

Journal Title: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.