This pilot study addressed the lack of evidence-based obesity treatment in traditional cardiac rehabilitation programs and found that adding a 6-mo behavioral weight loss intervention is not only feasible and… Click to show full abstract
This pilot study addressed the lack of evidence-based obesity treatment in traditional cardiac rehabilitation programs and found that adding a 6-mo behavioral weight loss intervention is not only feasible and safe but also promotes greater weight and fat loss and improves weight maintenance behaviors in adults with coronary heart disease and overweight/obesity. Purpose: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are integral in the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, most programs do not incorporate structured, evidence-based obesity treatment, potentially limiting efficacy for the large number of CHD patients with overweight/obesity. This pilot study determined the feasibility of adding a behavioral weight loss intervention during standard CR. Methods: Adults aged ≥40 yr with CHD and overweight/obesity were randomized to 6 mo of CR alone or CR plus a behavioral weight loss program incorporating meal replacements and individual dietary counseling (CR + WL). Body weight, adiposity, cardiometabolic risk factors, self-efficacy for eating, and stages and processes of change for weight management (S-Weight, P-Weight) were assessed at baseline and during follow-up. Results: Thirty-eight participants (64.5 ± 7.9 yr, 24% female, 16% Black/Hispanic) were enrolled over 18 mo. Retention was high, with 95% of participants completing the 6-mo follow-up visit. Participants attended ∼58% of the prescribed exercise sessions, and those in the CR + WL group attended 98% of the prescribed weight loss sessions. The CR + WL group lost significantly more weight than the CR group (6.4 ± 4.7% vs 1.2 ± 3.0%, P = .001), and there were significant treatment effects for total/regional adiposity, eating self-efficacy, and P-weight scores (all P values < .05). Overall, greater weight loss was associated with improvements in self-efficacy (P = .014) and P-weight scores for weight consequences evaluation (P = .007) and weight management actions (P = .04). Conclusions: A behavioral weight loss intervention during CR is feasible and safe, leading to greater weight and fat loss and related improvements in weight maintenance behaviors in overweight/obese adults with CHD.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.