LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

NCRP 52nd Annual Meeting, Meeting The Needs of the Nation for Radiation Protection: Where Do We Need To Be? Session Q&A (Session co-chairs Ralph L. Andersen and Robert C. Whitcomb, Jr.).

Photo by headwayio from unsplash

Q: Bystander effects can be both protective and detrimental. How does this influence support for the LNT (linear no-threshold) model? D. Brenner: The questioner is quite right: bystander effects can… Click to show full abstract

Q: Bystander effects can be both protective and detrimental. How does this influence support for the LNT (linear no-threshold) model? D. Brenner: The questioner is quite right: bystander effects can be killing effects, which at low doses would be protective, as well as mutagenic which might increase cancer risks. Which of those wins is something that we don’t know in the context of radiation-induced cancer. The other part of the answer is that we don't know if bystander effects are in any way significant in the radiation-induced cancer context. So we neither know whether bystander effects are going to reduce cancer risks or increase cancer risks, or even whether they are relevant to radiation-induced cancer risks. We've worked on bystander effects for quite a long time, and it's a bit disappointing to say that's as much as we know or don't know.

Keywords: meeting; session; cancer risks; cancer; bystander effects; radiation

Journal Title: Health Physics
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.