LAUSR

PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) procedures in keratoconic eyes with a previous hydrops-related corneal scar. METHODS In this retrospective study, the medical records of patients who had hydrops-related corneal scarring and underwent keratoplasty surgery were reviewed. Patients treated with DALK were classified as group 1, and patients treated with PK as group 2. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, keratometry (K), and refractive error values of each group were recorded and compared. RESULTS Seventy-eight eyes (41 in group 1 and 37 in group 2) were included in this study. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 37.7 ± 30.0 months in group 1 and 51.2 ± 29.4 months in group 2 (P = 0.06). The preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity and central corneal thickness values were statistically similar in both groups (each P value >0.05). Keratometry values (K1 and mean keratometry) were significantly steeper in group 1 (P1 = 0.02 and P2 = 0.03, respectively). Descemet membrane perforation was experienced in 7 (4 macroperforation and 3 microperforation; 15.6%) of 45 eyes that planned to perform DALK. These 4 eyes with macroperforation underwent PK and were excluded from the study. When all postoperative complications were assessed, although the total complication rate was 21% after DALK, it was 43% after PK (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS DALK with a big-bubble technique is a feasible surgery in eyes with corneal scarring due to previous hydrops and is comparable with PK in terms of visual and refractive outcomes. This study suggests that DALK, which is safer than PK with less postoperative complication rates, should be the primary surgical option to avoid serious complications in keratoconic eyes with hydrops-related corneal scarring.