LAUSR

ABSTRACT Pain is a frequent reason for patients to ask for medical services. However, systematic information about the extent and impact of pain, especially in developing countries, has not been available up to now. We evaluated, whether the 11th edition of the ICD can fill this gap by coding all electronic out-patient medical records of the pain clinic at Siriraj Hospital in Thailand in 2019 (8714 visits), using the ICD-10 and ICD-11 browsers referenced on the WHO websites. The three most frequent pain-related codes in ICD-10 were R52.2 "Other chronic pain" (29%), M54.5 "Low back pain" (18%), and M79.6 "Pain in limb" (13%). In ICD-11, the three most frequent codes were MG30.31 "Chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain associated with structural changes" (28%), MG30.51 "Chronic peripheral neuropathic pain" (26%), and MG30.10 "Chronic cancer pain" (23%). Thus, using the currently valid ICD-10 system, roughly one third of patient encounters were coded as "Other chronic pain", and the next two were specifying the pain region rather than any underlying cause. In contrast, ICD-11 coding of the same patients identified underlying causes (bones and joints, somatosensory nervous system, cancer or surgery), which provide guidance towards differential patient management. In our pain clinic, a majority of patients suffered from Chronic cancer pain, Chronic neuropathic pain, and Chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain, which were poorly defined or non-existent in the current ICD-10 coding system. Compared to the ICD-10, the ICD-11 provides more detailed diagnostic categories and is more informative for clinical use, research and resource allocation for pain-related conditions.