LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Evidence based objective performance criteria for evaluation of hip and knee replacement devices and technologies.

Photo by jordanmcdonald from unsplash

BACKGROUND Objective Performance Criteria (OPC) is a novel method to provide minimum performance standards and improve regulated introduction of original or incremental device innovations in order to prevent patients from… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND Objective Performance Criteria (OPC) is a novel method to provide minimum performance standards and improve regulated introduction of original or incremental device innovations in order to prevent patients from being exposed to potential inferior designs whilst allowing timely access to improvements. We developed 2-year safety and effectiveness OPC for Total Hip and Knee Replacement (THR and TKR). METHODS Analyses of large databases were conducted using various data sources: 1) a systematic literature review, 2) a direct data analysis from The Functional Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement and Quality Improvement Registry (FORCE-TJR) and the Kaiser Permanente Implant Registry (KPIR), and 3) claims data analyses from longitudinal discharge data in New York and California states. The literature review included US patients (≥18 years) who received THR or TKR for primary end-stage osteoarthritis and prospectively collected data on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from ≥100 subjects and/or two-year implant survival for ≥250 implants. Random effects models were used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Data was available from a total of 951,100 patients. After screening of 7,979 abstracts, 294 studies underwent full-text review and 31 studies contributed to the evidence synthesis (333,995 implants). Direct data analysis of FORCE-TJR contributed 9,223 joint replacement patients to the construction of OPC for effectiveness; KPIR contributed 262,044 patients for the construction of OPC for safety. Claims database analysis contributed 345,838 patients to the construction of safety OPC. OPC for safety were constructed for cumulative incidences of 2-year all-cause and septic revision (THR/TKR 2.0%/1.6% and 0.6%/0.7%) and OPC for effectiveness were constructed based on four disease-specific and three general health-related quality of life PROMs (HOOS/KOOS 87.1/80.6; HSS/KSS function 94.4/90.6; SF12/SF36 PCS 46.5/41.9, EQ-5D 0.88/0.84). CONCLUSION This study is the first to construct 2-year OPC for safety and effectiveness of THR and TKR based on US real-world data. Based on these OPC, potential benchmarks for (single-arm study) evaluation of new device innovations are suggested for regulated and safe introduction to the (commercial) market.

Keywords: objective performance; safety; performance criteria; replacement; effectiveness; performance

Journal Title: International journal of surgery
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.