LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Photo from wikipedia

PURPOSE Infectious complications following prostate biopsy (PB) are increasing and fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis has recently been banned by the European Commission. In this systematic review, we have summarized the evidence… Click to show full abstract

PURPOSE Infectious complications following prostate biopsy (PB) are increasing and fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis has recently been banned by the European Commission. In this systematic review, we have summarized the evidence for different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (Inception to Oct. 2019) assessing antimicrobial interventions in PB. Primary outcome was infectious complications. Exclusion criteria were simultaneous interfering interventions. GRADE was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015026354). RESULTS 59 RCTs (14.153 participants) and 7 different antimicrobial interventions were included. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduced infectious complications compared to no prophylaxis (RR 0·56, 95% CI 0·40-0·77, p=0·0005, I2=15%, participants=1753, studies=11). A short-term prophylaxis (single shot to 3 days) was inferior to a long-term prophylaxis (1 to 7 days) with FQ (RR 1·89, 95% CI 1·37-2·61, p=0·0001, I2=0%, participants=3999; studies=17). Fosfomycin trometamol was an alternative to FQ with reduced rates of infectious complications (RR 0·49, 95 CI 0·27-0·87; p=0·02, I2=54%, participants=1239, studies=3). Empiric prophylaxis was inferior to targeted prophylaxis (RR 1·81, 95% CI 1·28-2·55, p=0·0008, I2=48%, participants=1511, studies=6). Standard prophylaxis was inferior to augmented prophylaxis (using multiple rather than single agent) using a fixed model (RR 2·10, 95% CI 1.53-2.88, p<0·0001, I2=71%, participants=2597, studies=9), but not using a random model (p=0·07). No difference was observed in infectious complications based on route or timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis. The certainty of evidence was rated as low/very low. CONCLUSIONS In countries where fluoroquinolones are allowed as antibiotic prophylaxis, a minimum of a full 1-day administration as well as targeted therapy in case of fluoroquinolone resistance is recommended. In countries with a ban on fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin is a good alternative, as is augmented prophylaxis, although no established standard combination exists to date.

Keywords: complications following; following prostate; antibiotic prophylaxis; prostate biopsy; infectious complications; prophylaxis

Journal Title: Journal of Urology
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.