LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

PD19-08 DISCREPANCY IN PATHOLOGY REPORTS UPON SECOND REVIEW OF RADICAL ORCHIECTOMY SPECIMENS FOR TESTICULAR GERM CELL TUMORS

Photo from academic.microsoft.com

detection included imaging alone (42%), imaging combined with tumor markers (39%), and tumor markers alone (7.4%). LDH was elevated in 26 (15%) cases at relapse, and like in seminoma, never… Click to show full abstract

detection included imaging alone (42%), imaging combined with tumor markers (39%), and tumor markers alone (7.4%). LDH was elevated in 26 (15%) cases at relapse, and like in seminoma, never in isolation as the sole indicator of relapse. Among non-relapsing NSGCT patients diagnosed between January 2000 and August 2019 (n[311), 233 (75%) registered at least one false positive LDH, and 160 (52%) recorded multiple false positive LDH values. This translates into an average of 2.9 false positives per patient journey through surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: As a marker of testis cancer relapse, LDH did not independently contribute to early relapse detection in stage I seminoma or NSGCT. False positive values were documented in a high proportion of NSGCT with no disease relapse. Based on these results we advocate no longer measuring LDH in stage I surveillance protocols.

Keywords: pathology reports; pathology; relapse; false positive; discrepancy pathology; pd19 discrepancy

Journal Title: Journal of Urology
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.