Photo by alecs from unsplash
(Fig 1a). Greater consensus on the planned procedure was observed between the fellow and a senior surgeon when the IRIS 3D model was used (48.3% agreement with CT alone and… Click to show full abstract
(Fig 1a). Greater consensus on the planned procedure was observed between the fellow and a senior surgeon when the IRIS 3D model was used (48.3% agreement with CT alone and 84% with IRIS Fig 1b). In 99% of the reviews, surgeons rated that the IRIS 3D model accurately represented the anatomical details of all kidney components. CONCLUSIONS: Using the IRIS 3D model for preoperative planning offered a better spatial orientation of patient's anatomy, which in turn increased surgeon confidence in completing the planned procedure compared to 2D CT alone. This software tool has a potential to reduce variation in preoperative planning among surgeons.
Journal Title: Journal of Urology
Year Published: 2020
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!