LAUSR

Background Carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (cfPWV) is the gold standard measure of arterial stiffness and independently predicts cardiovascular disease. However, obtaining cfPWV requires technical precision and can be difficult in some populations. Brachial-femoral PWV (bfPWV) is a simpler alternative, but there is limited research comparing the two measures. For physiological studies, it is important to know how well the measures agree at rest, and to what extent changes in the measures correspond after perturbation. Objective To assess the overall and repeated measures agreement between cfPWV and bfPWV. Methods cfPWV and bfPWV were measured in the supine and seated positions, both before and after a 3-h bout of prolonged sitting. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for overall agreement was calculated using the random variance components from linear mixed-model regression. Repeated measures agreement (change in cfPWV vs. change in bfPWV) was calculated using repeated measures correlation. Results Complete data from 18 subjects (22.6 ± 3.1 years old, 33% female) were included in the analysis. There was strong (ICC ≥ 0.70) overall agreement (ICC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60–0.85) and very strong (ICC ≥ 0.90) repeated measures agreement (ICC, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84–0.94) between cfPWV and bfPWV. Discussion The current findings indicate strong overall agreement and very strong repeated measures agreement between bfPWV and cfPWV. bfPWV is a user-friendly alternative method that agrees with cfPWV-based assessments of central arterial stiffness.