LAUSR

Background: p16 protein is significantly down-regulated in several cancers, which reveals that it may be a potential biomarker for cancers. However, the clinicopathological and prognostic value of p16 protein in nasopharynx cancer patients remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationships of p16 protein expression with the clinicopathological features and prognosis of nasopharynx cancer. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Chinese CNKI were searched to obtain eligible data. The relationships of p16 protein expression with risk, clinicopathological features, and prognosis of nasopharynx cancer were analyzed with stata 14.0 software. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI (confidence interval) and hazards ratio (HR) with 95% CI were calculated to evaluate the association between p16 protein expression and nasopharynx cancer. Results: A total of 28 studies with 2612 nasopharynx cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. p16 protein expression was significantly associated with the risk, lymph node metastasis, TNM-stage (tumor-node-metastasis), distant metastasis, and T stage of nasopharynx cancer (Risk, OR = 17.82, 95% CI = 11.20–28.35; Lymph node metastasis, OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.42–3.14; TNM-stage, OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.54–3.28; Distant metastasis, OR = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.55–7.58; T-stage, OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.27–2.33). The negative rate of p16 protein expression in control group was 8.77%, while the negative rate of p16 protein expression in the nasopharynx cancer tissue was 63.78%. However, no significant associations of p16 expression with the overall survival and progression-free survival of nasopharynx cancer were found. Conclusion: The meta-analysis revealed that downregulated p16 expression was significantly associated with the risk, lymph node metastasis, TNM-stage, distant metastasis, and T stage of nasopharynx cancer. No significant association between p16 protein expression and prognosis of nasopharynx cancer was found. However, additional high-quality and multicenter studies should be conducted to validate these findings in the future.