LAUSR

Abstract Background: To evaluate the short-term efficacy, long-term efficacy, and adverse events (AEs) of elemene plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in comparison with TACE alone for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese Scientific Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang Data, CBM, and VIP were searched by 2 reviewers using the same search strategy for clinical studies on elemene plus TACE in the treatment of HCC. These articles were screened according to pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the qualities of the included studies were assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR), the 1-year survival rate and AEs. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 15.0 were used for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 10 studies involving 543 patients (TACE + elemene = 277, TACE alone = 266) were included. The results showed that the ORR was significantly improved in the combined treatment group compared to the TACE alone group (odds ratio [OR] = 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.84–4.00, P < .05). TACE + elemene significantly increased the 1-year survival rate (OR = 2.79, 95% CI: 1.58–4.95, P < .05). We also found no significant difference in gastrointestinal reactions (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.57–1.64, P = .90), fever (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.37–1.71, P = .56), or bone marrow suppression (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.44–1.22, P = .23) between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Based on current findings, TACE + elemene injection may improve the ORR and the 1-year survival rate for HCC patients compared to TACE alone. Arterial perfusion may be superior to intravenous guttae.