LAUSR

(Co The In the Abstract, “whereas the occurrence rate of TIPS dysfunction was higher in the PVT group.” is corrected as “whereas the occurrence rate of TIPS dysfunction was higher in the PVT group, but not statistically significant.” 2. In the Statistical Analyses, “Comparisons were performed by the t-test andMann–Whitney U test for normally distributed and nonnormally distributed variables, respectively.” is corrected as “Comparisons were performed by t-test and chi-square test for normally distributed and non-normally distributed variables, respectively.” 3. In the Results, “However, the incidence of shunt dysfunction was significantly higher in patients with PVT (P<.05) (Table 3)” is corrected as “The incidence of shunt dysfunction was higher in patients with PVT, but it was not statistically significant (P>.05) (Table 3)” 4. In the Discussion, “However, the incidence of TIPS dysfunction was significantly higher in individuals with PVT.” is corrected as “However, the incidence of TIPS dysfunction was higher in individuals with PVT, but not statistically significant.” 5. In the Discussion, “We found that TIPS alleviated bleeding in 100% of patients with a rebleeding rate of 18.5%,” is corrected as “We found that TIPS alleviated bleeding in 100% of patients with a rebleeding rate of 22.2%,” 6. In Table 1, the last row reads “Post-TIPS 24.00±5.05”, is now corrected as “Post-TIPS 24.14 ± 3.84” 7. Table 3 is corrected according to the Chi-square test result as follows: