LAUSR

Background: Xuebijing injection (XBJ) has increasingly been used for sepsis in China. We aimed to evaluate the methodological quality and summarize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of XBJ combined with ulinastatin (UTI) for sepsis from systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs). Methods: From the inception to May 23, 2021, eight databases were searched to screen the SRs/MAs of XBJ combined with UTI in the treatment of sepsis. Methodology Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the methods. Grading of Recommendation,Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used in the assessment of evidence quality. Results: Seven SRs/MAs on XBJ combined with UTI treatment for sepsis were included. The AMSTAR-2 showed that the methodological quality of all included SRs/MAs was rated as critically low. According to the evaluation results of GRADE, 30% (13/44), 30% (13/44), and 40% (18/44) were rated to be of moderate, low, and critically low quality, respectively. Descriptive analysis results showed that XBJ combined with UTI was an effective treatment modality for sepsis. Conclusions: All included SRs/MAs showed that XBJ combined with UTI was more effective than UTI alone in the treatment of sepsis on the basis of conventional treatment, but the reliability of the results was limited due to the disadvantages of lower methodological quality and higher risk of bias in the included SRs/MAs. Further high-quality clinical studies and SRs/MAs are recommended to verify whether XBJ combined with UTI is more effective than UTI alone.