LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction and restrictive allograft syndrome: are phenotypes robust and helpful?

Photo from wikipedia

Purpose of review New chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) consensus documents were published in 2019, defining four phenotypes; bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, restrictive allograft syndrome, mixed and undefined. Clearly, validation of… Click to show full abstract

Purpose of review New chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) consensus documents were published in 2019, defining four phenotypes; bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, restrictive allograft syndrome, mixed and undefined. Clearly, validation of these guidelines in a real life cohort is critical. Recent findings Indeed, validation has been performed recently, both after bilateral lung transplantation (LTx) and after single LTx illustrating that precise phenotyping based on pulmonary function alone can be difficult. Undertaking regular chest computed tomography scanning does appear very helpful in establishing the prognosis of the patients with CLAD. Summary Pulmonary function changes may not always identify the exact phenotype of CLAD and we provide further evidence for the important role of chest imaging at diagnosis and during the follow-up of patients with CLAD.

Keywords: restrictive allograft; allograft dysfunction; lung; allograft; lung allograft; chronic lung

Journal Title: Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.