LAUSR

Purpose of review Caliceal diverticula are relatively uncommon within urologic practice and may be difficult to diagnose and treat. We aim to highlight contemporary studies examining surgical interventions for patients with caliceal diverticula, with a focus on percutaneous intervention, and provide updated practical recommendations for the management of these patients. Recent findings Studies within the last 3 years examining surgical treatment options for caliceal diverticular calculi are limited. When flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are examined within the same observational cohorts, PCNL is associated with improved stone-free rates (SFRs), lower requirement for re-intervention, and longer lengths of stay (LOS). Retrograde f-URS for the treatment of caliceal diverticula and diverticular calculi is associated with satisfactory safety and efficacy outcomes. There are no studies in the last 3 years that provide supporting evidence to use shock wave lithotripsy to treat caliceal diverticular calculi. Summary Recent studies examining surgical interventions for patients with caliceal diverticula are limited to small observational studies. Heterogeneity in LOS and follow-up protocol limits comparisons between series. Despite technological advancements in f-URS, PCNL appears to be associated with more favorable and definitive outcomes. PCNL continues to be the preferred treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic caliceal diverticula when deemed technically feasible.