LAUSR

BACKGROUND Despite the widespread use of the Cottle maneuver as a finding to define nasal valve collapse, no studies have confirmed the association between a positive Cottle maneuver and need for nasal valve repair. This study demonstrates the low construct validity of the Cottle maneuver. METHODS One hundred healthy volunteer students and employees at Boston Medical Center were recruited for this study. Participants were asked to evaluate their breathing on a 10-point scale, rating their subjective airflow in each nostril while occluding the contralateral nostril, where 0 indicated complete obstruction and 10 indicated complete patency. Following the baseline ratings, participants were asked to rate their breathing once again while examiners preformed the Cottle and modified Cottle maneuvers. RESULTS Overall, 97 percent of participants reported improved airflow in each nostril following the Cottle maneuver (p < 0.00001); 98 percent reported improved airflow in each nostril following the modified Cottle maneuver (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS If the clinical consensus regarding the observed improvement in nasal airflow is to be followed, nearly all the participants recruited are experiencing some surgically correctable nasal obstruction. Given the population from which our cohort was collected-students and residents from a medical campus-such a conclusion seems extremely unlikely. We believe the more likely explanation for the high positive test rate is flawed assumptions of the Cottle and modified Cottle maneuvers. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, V.