LAUSR

Objective The aim of the study was to compare intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for evaluating lung cancer using single-shot turbo spin-echo (TSE) and single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in a 3T MR system. Methods Both single-shot TSE-DWI and single-shot EPI-DWI were scanned twice respectively for 15 patients with lung cancer. Distortion ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared between the 2 techniques. The Bland-Altman analysis was performed to analyze reproducibility between the parameters of TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI. Short-term test-retest repeatability, as well as interobserver agreement, was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Result Turbo spin-echo DWI has lower signal-to-noise ratio and similar contrast-to-noise ratio compared with EPI-DWI. Distortion ratio of TSE-DWI was significantly smaller than that of EPI-DWI. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and true diffusivity (D) of TSE-DWI showed higher values than those of EPI-DWI. The Bland-Altman analysis showed unacceptable limits of agreement between these 2 sequences. Test-retest repeatability was good for ADC and D of EPI-DWI (CV, 14.11%–16.60% and 17.08%–19.53%) and excellent for ADC and D of TSE-DWI (CV, 4.8%–6.19% and 6.05%–8.71%), but relatively poor for perfusion fraction (f) and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) (CV, 25.95%–27.70% and 56.92%–71.84% for EPI, 23.67%–28.67% and 60.85%–70.17% for TSE). For interobserver agreement, both techniques were good to excellent in ADC and D (The lower limit of 95% confidence interval for ICC was almost all greater than 0.75), whereas D* and f had higher interobserver variabilities with D* of TSE-DWI showing poorest reproducibility (ICC, −0.27 to 0.12). Conclusions Lung DWI or IVIM using TSE could provide distortion-free images and improve the test-retest robustness of ADC and D as compared with EPI-DWI; however, it might exert a negative effect on perfusion parameter D*.