LAUSR

Objectives Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most widespread chronic liver disease type in the Western countries. Ultrasound (US) is used for NAFLD and hepatic steatosis (HS) grading. The most popular US method for NAFLD assessment is the hepatorenal index (HRI), but because of its limitations, other noninvasive methods have been developed. The Resona 7 US system has recently incorporated an US attenuation–related quantitative feature, liver ultrasound attenuation (LiSA), for HS estimation. The purpose of this study is to compare LiSA’s and HRI’s performance on NAFLD assessment. Methods A total of 159 NAFLD patients having a magnetic resonance imaging–proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) examination were examined by 2 radiologists, who performed LiSA and HRI measurements in the liver. Correlation of LiSA's and HRI's measurements with MRI-PDFF values was calculated through Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). To further investigate the performance of LiSA and HRI, optimum cutoffs, provided by the literature, were used to correspond HS grades to MRI-PDFF results. Moreover, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on LiSA measurements and steatosis grades was performed. Results Magnetic resonance imaging–PDFF was better correlated with LiSA (PCC = 0.80) than HRI (PCC = 0.67). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed better performance range for LiSA (77.8%–91.8%) than for HRI (72.8%–85.4%) on all HS grades for all studies used for corresponding MRI-PDFF values to HS grades. Conclusions The results indicate that LiSA is more accurate than HRI in HS differentiation and can lead to more accurate grading of HS on NAFLD patients.