LAUSR

BACKGROUND Facial burns have lasting physical and psychological effects on pediatric patients. Proper management to minimize morbidities challenges reconstructive surgeons. New technologies allowed the development of skin substitutes such as amniotic and chorionic membranes, yet the use of these skin dressings and their impact on burn outcomes have not been sufficiently studied to guide practices. The objective of this study is to report on the outcomes of dehydrated amniotic membrane as a biologic skin dressing in pediatric facial burn injury compared to cadaveric allografts. METHODS Retrospective review of data collected from our institutional burn registry from 2012 to 2016. The study population included patients younger than 16 years with facial burns. Patients between 2012 and 2014 received cadaveric allografts, whereas during 2015 to 2016 patients received dehydrated human amniotic/chorionic membrane as standard treatment. Demographic characteristics and outcome measures were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Included 30 patients with a mean age of 3.7 years and with an average total body surface area burn of 6.8% (2%-27%). Mean injury severity scores did not significantly differ between both groups, 1.8 in amniotic group versus 2.3 in cadaveric skin group (P > 0.05). There were 4 complications (3 hypertrophic scars and 1 wound infection) in the cadaveric allografts group versus no complications in the amniotic membrane group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Dehydrated amniotic/chorionic membrane wound dressings are a safe alternative to cadaveric allografts in treating pediatric partial thickness facial burns.