Background: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protect myocardial tissue against subsequent ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI) and have a high potential to improve patient outcome. The mediators… Click to show full abstract
Background: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protect myocardial tissue against subsequent ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI) and have a high potential to improve patient outcome. The mediators and mechanisms of protection through IPC and RIPC remain largely unknown, but micro-RNAs (miRNAs) are promising candidates. Methods: Systematic review of Medline and Embase databases for biomedical scientific literature. Results: A total of 26 relevant publications (21 full-text original articles and 5 conference abstracts) were identified, 8 describing cell culture experiments, 14 animal experiments, and 4 randomized clinical trials in humans. Most commonly reported miRNAs with differential expression between preconditioned and control groups include miR-1, miR-21, and miR-144. Experimental designs and procedures differ widely, thereby limiting the potential to compare results between studies. Two of the four RCTs did not find any differentially expressed miRNAs. Conclusions: Results from RCTs should feed back into basic research and focused studies confirming or rejecting hypotheses generated by these RCTs are needed.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.