LAUSR

A review of the efficacy of different approaches to VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. BACKGROUND Trauma patients are at high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), and standard dosing enoxaparin regimens may be inadequate for prophylaxis. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify the efficacy of alternative dosing regimens for VTE prophylaxis in this high-risk group. The objective of this systematic review was to review the evidence regarding weight-based dosing of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. METHODS A systematic database search was undertaken for studies comparing standard versus weight-based dosing of enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in adult trauma patients, 18 years or older. The primary outcome was the achievement of anti–factor Xa (AFXa) levels within the prophylactic range. Secondary outcomes included subprophylactic AFXa levels, supraprophylactic AFXa levels, VTE incidence, and bleeding events. Meta-analysis was conducted using both fixed- and random-effects models, and presented as odds ratios, risk ratios (RRs), and risk differences (RDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Four cohort studies were eligible for inclusion. Compared with standard dosing, weight-based enoxaparin prophylaxis dosing was associated with increased odds of prophylactic AFXa levels (odds ratio, 5.85; 95% CI, 3.02–11.30; p < 0.00001) and reduced risk of subprophylactic AFXa levels (RR, 3.97; 95% CI, 3.02–5.22; p < 0.00001). Standard dosing was associated with a reduced risk of supratherapeutic AFXa levels (RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11–0.50; p = 0.0002), but this was not associated with a difference in risk of bleeding events (RD, −0.00; 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.01; p = 0.55). There was no statistical difference in incidence VTE between the two groups (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.03; p = 0.64). CONCLUSION Compared with standard dosing, weight-based enoxaparin dosing regimens are associated with increased odds of prophylactic range AFXa levels. Further investigation is required to determine if this translates into improved VTE prophylaxis and reduced VTE incidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; Level III.