LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Is severe traumatic brain injury no longer a contraindication for surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with multiple rib fractures? A propensity-matched analysis

Photo by behy_studio from unsplash

In a TQIP-based propensity-matched analysis, patients with TBI and multiple rib fractures undergoing rib fixation showed decreased mortality and longer hospital and ICU lengths of stay. These findings suggest a… Click to show full abstract

In a TQIP-based propensity-matched analysis, patients with TBI and multiple rib fractures undergoing rib fixation showed decreased mortality and longer hospital and ICU lengths of stay. These findings suggest a role for SSRF in TBI. #SoMe4Trauma #SoMe4Surgery @EmanueleLagazzi; @eljefe_md; @argandykov; @MGHSurgery; @TraumaMGH; #SoMe4Trauma; #SoMe4Surgery BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often considered a contraindication to surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). In this study, we hypothesized that, compared with nonoperative management, SSRF is associated with improved outcomes in TBI patients. METHODS Using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2016–2019, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with concurrent TBI and multiple rib fractures. Following propensity score matching, we compared patients who underwent SSRF with those who were managed nonoperatively. Our primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-associated pneumonia, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, tracheostomy rate, and hospital discharge disposition. In a subgroup analysis, we stratified patients into mild and moderate TBI (GCS score >8) and severe TBI (GCS score ≤8). RESULTS Of 36,088 patients included in this study, 879 (2.4%) underwent SSRF. After propensity-score matching, compared with nonoperative management, SSRF was associated with decreased mortality (5.4% vs. 14.5%,p < 0.001), increased hospital LOS (15 days vs. 9 days, p < 0.001), increased ICU LOS (12 days vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), and increased ventilator days (7 days vs. 4 days, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analyses, in mild and moderate TBI, SSRF was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (5.0% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.006), increased hospital LOS (13 days vs. 9 days, p < 0.001), ICU LOS (10 days vs. 7 days, p < 0.001), and ventilator days (5 days vs. 2 days, p < 0.001). In patients with severe TBI, SSRF was associated with decreased mortality (6.2% vs. 18%, p < 0.001), increased hospital LOS (20 days vs. 14 days, p = 0.001), and increased ICU LOS (16 days vs. 13 days, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION In patients with TBI and multiple rib fractures, SSRF is associated with a significant decrease in in-hospital mortality and with longer hospital and ICU LOSs. These findings suggest that SSRF should be considered in patients with TBI and multiple rib fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Keywords: ssrf; days days; rib fractures; multiple rib; days 001

Journal Title: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.